The additive way to ease economic uncertainty

Headshot-Paul Adams
Headshot-Paul Adams

Paul Adams, head of aerospace and defence at supply chain firm Vendigital, discusses the impact of additive manufacturing for aerospace companies.

Since the UK voted to leave the EU in June of 2016, businesses across a wide range of sectors have been feeling the impact of an unstable economic climate. Moreover, the current weak pound-dollar exchange rate and concerns over future barriers to trade and labour movement are having a particular impact on the aerospace sector.

Furthermore, with the development of globalised supply chains, airlines from countries with low labour costs such as China and India are placing increased orders for civil aircraft, placing pressure on the likes of Airbus and Boeing to place work within these regions.

Combined, these two factors are having a significant impact on prices within aerospace supply chains and firms that are unable to cut costs must find a way to differentiate themselves from their competitors to maintain and grow market share.

Investing in additive manufacturing (AM) and other advanced manufacturing techniques is an important way that aerospace companies can set themselves apart from the marketplace and attract foreign investment. AM is often perceived as a manufacturing method for the future, however, this is a misconception. Allowing manufacturers to form lighter and stronger components and reduce waste, this technique is already being used to produce non-critical components such as aircraft seating.

Nevertheless, AM’s true value will be realised ten or 15 years down the line when new aircraft are designed specifically with the process in mind. Although developments in the technology have not yet reached this stage, it is essential that aerospace companies prove their expertise now in order to be in the best position for winning future contracts.

When purchasing 3D printing technology, firms should consider their investment strategy carefully and ensure they understand the associated risks in order to maximise its value.

Both the machinery and powder elements of AM have been under development for some time, with much of this work previously focused on the automotive sector. With powder technology only recently achieving a level of sophistication suitable for the aerospace sector, companies should take great care to ensure they both attain the correct type of powder and possess a full understanding of how it behaves during the manufacturing process. As AM is developing it is critical that firms not only understand the IP involved, but get in early.

Additionally, manufacturers need to consider how to facilitate rapid production using the additive process and the resulting demands on their supply chains. This technology is just emerging as a method of mass production or for the creation of complex structural components within the aerospace sector. With OEMs often used to pushing the detailed design of sub-components into their supply chains, design capability will also be a particularly important factor for big tier one manufacturers to bear in mind.

For aircraft companies looking to take advantage of AM, there are two alternative approaches. For most UK firms, moving quickly to invest in the process ahead of competitors will provide a certain advantage, allowing them to establish themselves within the sector. This will place them in a good position for securing deals when advancements in this technology occur in the future. However, for companies unwilling to involve themselves in the technology development process, an alternative and perhaps more fruitful approach is to hang back and make an acquisition of either IP or manufacturing capability once the technology has been developed.

At the 2016 ILA Berlin Airshow, Airbus sparked the imagination of the aerospace sector by displaying the first aircraft to be produced solely using 3D printing (the Thor drone). However, in reality, the complexity involved in producing many aircraft components would make investing in specialist machines for this purpose unfeasible for most.

Despite this fact, developments in alternative manufacturing techniques will eventually lead to the use of AM for larger and more critical parts. By taking the time to learn about the necessary IP and plan their investment strategies carefully, aerospace firms can manoeuvre themselves into the best position possible to overcome economic instability and increase market share within a competitive industry.

https://vendigital.com

Company

Vendigital

Related Articles

TCT 3Sixty brochure

If you’re a designer, engineer or manufacturer looking to evaluate, adopt or optimise 3D printing for your business, TCT 3Sixty is the event for you.
1 year ago Sponsored Content

From ideas to reality

Proto Labs director, Damian Hennessey looks at how the UK aerospace industry is undergoing a transformation via the increasing adoption of digital manufacturing processes.
7 years ago Features
Most recent Articles

Here’s the aircraft to be showcased at ILA 2024

Be it the latest prototype of the Lilium eVTOL, the Do328 Uplift as a flying test bed for eco-friendly aviation technology, or the world’s largest airliner – from 5-9 June a comprehensive range of aircraft will be on display at ILA Berlin.
1 day ago News

Aura Aero and SGEF announce cooperation

French aircraft manufacturer Aura Aero and Societe Generale Equipment Finance (SGEF), the international subsidiary of Société Générale group, have announced a cooperation in the field of aircraft financing.
1 day ago News

Login / Sign up